One Common Language Essay

According to an eleventh century Arab writer, Ibn-e-Hazm, in the graduation exercise there existed a hit speech communication given by God, thank to which Adam was able to beneathstand the quiddity of things. Over the chequered accounting of mankind, the fragmentation of this unique tongue that existed abinitio gave rise to a multitude of divers(prenominal) languages. An integration of each(prenominal) these, or a reversion to a single language would have some(prenominal) repercussions. The fundamental benefits of a single cosmea language are pragmatic. A common language would dissolve all conference barriers and increase mutual understanding between people and the population over. Such an environment would be conducive to population peace and the subvert of conflicts. Economic prosperity would be facilitated as business partners are able to communicate freely, leading to a growth of international trade. Xenophobia and other connect human fears would be eliminated as people are united under one language.This would undermine at least some racism or ethno-centrism as societies become more egalitarian in their outlook on foreign individuals. On the cultural front, a unique tongue would gift redundant the need to translate works of literature or to supply/dub movies. The dissemination of knowledge and information could be done freely and in all parts of the globe, as the worlds inclusion of different cultures rises. However, there are some drawbacks of a single world language. The convenience of a single language with its resulting blandness would not comprise for a full life. Language is more than just a communication of needs, it is a reflection of the social, historical and cultural milieu of society and is accordingly a sacred institution. By restricting the modes of human expression to a single language we would be stultifying, repressing and suffocating mans desire to be creative. The limits of my language are the limits of my world, as p syche once aptly noted.Also, in a manner similar to the office depicted in George Orwells Nineteen Eighty-four, a single language is a dangerous situation as it may throw away disproportionate power into the few hands controlling the medium. Although the implementation of a single language is an achievable target, the situation is bound to be cursory and impossible to maintain in the long run. Cultural differences between societies authorize language. This is proven by the distinct cultures of the countries speaking the same language.Hence, although the same language, English, as spoken in Canada for instance, is dissimilar to that spoken in the coupled Kingdom, the United States of Australia. Also, the culture of a country may be composed of several sub-cultures each with its own language. The home of the Queens English the UK is where English, Gaelic, Welsh, Punjabi, Bengali and Urdu, all coexist. Another obstacle in achieving this target of common language is political pri de, which could create conflict between nations, when the choice of a controlling language is being made. In the light of the above discussion, I would put forward that if we are to succeed economically, socially, culturally and politically, then the world must boob plurilinguism. The future is a multi-lingual one.