Philosophy of Art Essay

Introduction This paper attempts to establish what practiti hotshotrs of philosophy base guide from practitioners of Art. In doing so, the paper first off looks into prowess and philosophy so as to rear a clear understanding of the subjects, before turning into the primary(prenominal) theme.What is Art? Even though the above straits appears simple, it is interesting and seat, and is answered by reverting to the philosophy of guile. In addition, device wrap ups descriptions of apricot, taste, symbolism as salubrious as re fork upation. philosophical system of maneuverworkistry also searchs the association existing amidst the individual creative person (ideas), and the bigger congregation (audiences, culture, and universe) (Carroll N, 1998).That being the case, what does philosophy of wile tell us astir(predicate) ruse? Some versions assert that art is a creative activity, expression or process of forgivings. According to social lion Tolstoy Art is that human activity which consists in one human consciously conveying to others, by certain(a) external signs, the feelings he has experienced and in others being affected by those feelings and also experiencing them. (Carroll N, 1998).On the other hand, when something is do perfectly or acquainted by study and practice it is referred to as an art (Carroll N, 1998). For instance, driving a car, dressing in a comfortably dress, laying a child to sleep or even the art of conversion.In essence, art includes objects developed by humans that have aesthetical value or present symbolic meaning encompassing drawings, paintings as salutary as sculpture. Thus from the above observations, art can be said to be a symbolic workation of rafts association with character (reality/environments). It is able to render the concealed relations between things. It is beauty, it is im set aboutiality. However, what does truth and beauty imply? This is where philosophy comes in as philosophy is the art of es tablishing the truth such that this truth is applied to life. In the same manner, art can be based on established truth that express the admiration and beauty of a relationship to the universe as it is ac experience in the works of Marcel Proust and Henry Mattisse (Diffey T, 1995).Art is a selective pastime of reality according to an artists metaphysical value judgments. An artist recreates those shots of reality which represent his fundamental view of mans records. (Marcell Proust)( Diffey T, 1995), plot of ground Henry Mattisse writes when we speak of nature, it is wrong to forget that we be ourselves a part of nature. We ought to view ourselves with the same curiosity and openness with which we study a tree, the peddle or a thought because we too are linked to the ideal universe (Diffey T, 1995).The different forms of art are visual liberal liberal arts which convey aspects such as painting, photography and sculpture among others, and fine arts which embrace music, da nce, theatre, literature, poetry, etc.What is philosophy?As William Thomas purposes out, Philosophy studies the fundamental nature of existence of man and mans relationship to existencein the realm of cognition, the special sciences are the trees but philosophy is the soil which cast offs the woodwind instrument possible (Bender J, 1993).A philosophy is an all inclusive organization of ideas concerning human nature as rise(p) as the nature of the truth we fuck in. it is a guide of living since the subjects it deals with are crucial and enveloping, establishing the course we mystify in life and how we treat other people.Among the roughly important line of products that philosophers deal with fall into a number of separate fields. Among them, the most coercives ones are metaphysics which deals with the theory of reality, epistemology that connotes the theory of intimacy, ethics which is theory of moral values, authorities which is theory of legal rights and government and aesthetics which refers to theory of nature of art (Carroll N, 1998).The vehicle for philosophical guidance is religions such as Buddhism, Christianity, Judaism as easy as Islam. Religions vary from philosophers not in the issues they deal with but in the counsellings they employ to address them. Religions are based on fab stories that existed earlier before discovery of unequivocally cogent methods of inquiry (Bender J, 1993).The present day religion (majority of) appeal to mystical faith as salubrious as revelation sort of belief that claim legitimacy freelance of logic, and the scientific method, at least made for the biggest subjects. However, majority of religions are in their commencement pre-rational as opposed to anti-rational, a story tellers account of philosophic issues as opposed to scientists (Bender J, 1993).Philosophy in classic connotes love of wisdom. Philosophy is founded on rational arguments and appeal to facts (Bender J, 1993). modern-day science history b egan with philosophical enquiries and the scientific method of research and trifle is an aspect of the general approach that a philosopher attempts to bring to a question one that is coherent and vigorous.Philosophy is known to offer deep and encompassing questions presently. Dealing with the issues in each branch of philosophy calls for integration of everything one knows concerning reality (metaphysics) or humanity (epistemology, ethics, politics and aesthetics) recommending reasonable inclination in philosophy at that placefore is not a simple job. Frankly, philosophers more a lot than not disagree about principle subject some steal their own positions in the mix as well (Diffey T, 1995). Thus, there is no particular philosophy initiation wide as is the case with physics, chemistry among other disciplines. Having clearly distinguished the two disciplines, then we can enrol on the issue of what a philosopher can get wind from an artist. This calls us to explore the subfi eld of philosophy. It relates to nature of art, in addition to performing of arts as well as painting, sculpture and literature (Diffey T, 1995). Major concerns in aesthetic contain of how artistic creations should be construed as well as assessed and how the arts are linked to one another, to natural beauty, morality, religious science as well as other crucial aspects of human life.The association between art and epistemology has been ever soundingly tenuous and burdened with a lot of arguments (Diffey T, 1995). It is ac fellowshipd that there is something meaningful from experiences as well as interactions with works of arts. However, it is not considered as obvious that whether or not the experiences one has with art can elevate propositional understanding that is represented by true vindicated belief (Diffey T, 1995). Whereas pursue objects aesthetically is both insightness and emotionally burdening practice, it is also essentially cognitive. Therefore, it can be said that a esthetic engagement is based on various epistemological concerns (Carroll N, 1998). For instance, philosophers claim to know about art. People say that they believed the play was good or bad, but the emotions it produced were called for, justified, manipulative or suitable. In most cases, people allege that they see from art, that art alters their view of the world and that art has parting on the way they view as well as make spirit of the world (Carroll N, 1998). It also widely ac fellowshipd that works of arts particularly good works of art, can cause view points about the world and can in turn offer knowledge concerning the world (Carroll N, 1998). However, what can exactly be known about art? Does art have any sort of propositional content that resembles the context that philosophers claim to study for other sort of knowledge claim? The subject of whether philosophers have something to learn from artists revolves back to the period of Plato. Plato warned about the perils o f making a fuss of representational as well as narrative demonstrations of the world and human actions. A practitioner of philosophy by his engagement with art permits certain emotions or activities that are able to facilitate or produce knowledge. It should be acknowledged that some aspects of art work that are able to produce greater understanding of the surrounding world (Carroll N, 1998). In this case, art becomes a kickoff of insight as well as awareness, even though it cannot be put into propositional language. It can help people (philosophy practitioners) see the world in a new or different way (Carroll N, 1998). They are oft those who view art as being in open(a) of offering knowledge primarily because it does not generate any truth they argue that since art cannot offer facts or produce arguments then there is nothing to learn from it (Diffey T, 1995). They further argue that art cannot be acknowledged as a source of knowledge as it is not productive of knowledge, constr ued in the convectional sense of vindictive true belief.They assert that art is devoid of propositional content capable of being learnt the conventional way, whereas it has influences that promote knowledge and that can promote or weaken the increment of understanding. Thus the net effect is to reject art as a source of knowledge as it does not offer true beliefs and furthermore because it does not as well as cannot vindicate the views that it does express (Diffey T, 1995). However, those who are for and those against concur that art is a source of knowledge, the save way that it can probably satisfy such a function be it that knowledge neglected something crucial to arts nature as well as value (Diffey T, 1995).Plato articulates that it is possible for an artist to make a representation of a thing without having advance knowledge of his presentation. For instance, painters represent cobblers when the painters have no idea how to make shoes, and poets write about virtue such as b eauty and courage without any clear knowledge of these attributes (Carroll N, 1998).To Plato, it is only philosophers and moreover, those who struggle to intuit (feel) the forms and employ abstract reasoning are able to have know-how of these virtues. To him, the same things exist even for the literary arts in particular. He asserts that the more one engages in emotions brought about by representations, the more likely one is to suffer the influences of an unstable soul and in the long run the growth of bad attitude (Carroll N, 1998).Aristotle seems to have agreed with Plato that art influences the development of ones moral character. These two philosophers believed that people learn from art, however, Plato argued that the gained knowledge was harmful while Aristotle argued that it was beneficial (Carroll N, 1998).Going back to the period of spiritual rebirth and beyond it should be noted that the works of art such as poetry and fiction engages the emotions of a philosopher in a healthy way rather as opposed to detrimental manner (Bender J, 1993). Some philosophers point out that there are there crucial types of knowledge claims that can be made concerning arts which are distinguished by objects.The first is what philosophers claim to know or believe concerning the art object itself and anything ineffectual or fictional worlds might be linked to that object. The second aspect of knowledge claim about art relates to what is known or believed to be appropriate emotional reaction to the art work. It is crucial to note at this point that works of art are correct, understood through having a certain kind of emotional response to them (Bender J, 1993).The only problem encountered in this course is that it is not possible to establish the kind of response that is appropriate in relation to a particular work of art (Bender J, 1993).The last kind of knowledge claim that is available as far as art is concerned relates to the nature of information art can offer abou t the whole world (Bender J, 1993). It is important to note that art affords imperative insight into the way philosophers order and understand the world. Art gives a certain degree of meaning to the lives of philosophers. Art, particularly literature, draws out novel views (beliefs) as well as new knowledge concerning the world (Bender J, 1993).Conclusion From the above, it is noteworthy that philosophy practitioners have a lot to learn from practitioners of art. It is important to acknowledge what constitutes knowledge so as to be able to understand how art impacts the subject. honorable mention Bender, John (1993). Art as a Source of Knowledge Linking analytical Aesthetics and Epistemology. In Contemporary Philosophy of Art, ed. John Bender and broker Blocker. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall.Carroll, Noel (1998). Art, Narrative, and Moral Understanding. In Aesthetics and Ethics Essays at the Intersection, ed. Jerrold Levinson. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Diffey, T .J ( 1995) What Can We Learn From Art? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 202-11.