.

Sunday, March 31, 2019

Peter Honey And Mumford Learning Styles

Peter H iodiney And Mumford Learning StylesLearners have developed antithetic encyclopedism sprints which suites them come ingo to take studies. Each agreeing styles has its own readiness and weaknesses which differ from the others and It is essential for e precise jibeer to know about(predicate) his or her go steadying styles beca engage this helps to see aras of weaknesses and look for possible solutions to that weakness.Literature overviewThere argon different theories on learning styles which atomic come 18 David Kolb, Peter Honey,Alan Mumford, Anthony Gregorc , Chickering and Gameson.,Carl Jung and Richard M.Felder .Kolbs learning styleAccording to Kolbs original model, Learning is the process whereby knowledge is created through the geological fault of experience, (David A. Kolb, 19841). He introduces four learning styles which atomic number 18 Concrete Experience it is when a learner has a naked as a jaybird experience comp ard to previous experience and has t o do .Reflective observation these varies between appreciation and previous experience. Abstract Conceptualization manifestation gives rise to a new view or a adjustment of an existing abstract idea (Kolb, 19841) this is when a learner adjusts to new learning styles. Active Experimentation here the learner riding habits the knowledge acquired in the existing world.Kolbs learning styles argon thitherfore divided into four categories which be assimilators convergers, obligers and diverges. Assimulators atomic number 18 learners that learn surpass using sound logical information An assimulator greatest strength lie in creating theoretical models Other strengths be understanding what they be head for the hillsing on this gives them a better direction to figure problems. Curious and admires problems this give them to a greater extent knowledge as more than questions are answered. Plans strong in advance for exams this makes them more ready to tackle problems. potty ma ke facts and material well .However they have they have some weaknesses which includes the bring of too ofttimes information before acquire down to work, does non like to try new approaches ,not creative and keeps a number of problems to himself. Collects to much information. Convergers uses practical applications in that respect need what is relevant to them .These one are more interested with facts and desire to go straight to the point. Can work well alone which makes them less dependent on others. Get things through in time this does not involves them in late submissions. Pays attention to detail .However there have a number of weaknesses which are Lack of imagination .Not very interested in presentation of your work. Believes that there is only one course of doing things. Does not like others ideas. Accommodators are those who want hands on experiences .Divergers are the one that learn best when they are allowed to observe and collect things from a wide range of collecti on these learners observe and collect. They have the following strengths careful that is there are more stable to situation like exams .Listens to others and shares idea this give them more ideas and different points of view. They are good at comprehend the big picture. They can see long-term implications of things. They can see new ways of doing things and has creative solutions. They can multi-task .However they have the following weaknesses they for sign on the all important(p) elaborate while understanding the big picture .Does not organize work well .Does not like work or edict timetables.Forgets to bring important books.Gregorc Learning StylesThere are divided into cardinal categories which are concrete random, concrete sequent, abstract sequential, abstract random. On concrete random according to Gregorc,They use their instincts and intuition when making decisions.(Gregorc)The learner is divergent ,data-based, inventive therefore the learner is much more involved in c reating and acting and usefulness and application of learning .They have a mint of questions about what surrounds them .Concrete sequential efficient and well informed and the learner is more practical and active in making things work. According to Gregorc,They notice and crawfish out details easily and remember facts ,specific information ,formulas, and rules with ease,(Gregorc)They do not confide more on others and hardworking and their work is consistent and has facts. Abstract sequential reflects on information and think about it. According to Grgorc,they opt convinced(p) processes and are thorough in their work,(Gregorc) .Abstract random is imaginative and reflect on an previous experience, emotional and holistic .According to Grgorc,they take are very perceptive students ,(Gregorc)This one visualize and is intuitive when dealing with ideas .Chickering and GamsonFrom look into there are seven learning styles which are visual, aural, verbal, physical, logical, social and solitary. According to ( Chickering and Gamson, 2012 1 ) there is visual/spatial which prefer using pictures and spatial understanding That is one uses visual abilities to learn something for causa understanding the demand law by eyesight cartoons pictures or lecture videos however this is an disadvantage to the blind. For visual there are helpful tips like turning notes to pictures and making mind and concept maps Aural /auditory-musical is when one prefer using sound and music as a learning style One can learn from vie recorded sound tracks and the helpful tips are repeating materials out big and in your own words .Verbal /linguistic You prefer using words, both(prenominal) in speech and penning, These one understand more using their ears , logical(mathematical) prefer using logic, reasoning and systems these prefer facts not theories and they should be convergers Social (interpersonal) You prefer to learn in groups or with other people. Solitary (intrapersonal) prefer to w ork alone and use self-study. They enjoy independency.Richard M.Felder learning stylesThese learning styles are in seven categories which are active ,reflective ,sensing ,intuitive ,visual ,verbal and sequential learners .Active learners best understand by practising something which is active with it .For exercising discussion the in group works .They excessively like the idea of explaining to other learners and application of knowledge. Reflective learners are more independent and they prefer to figure out things alone than in groups. detection learners they like to solve problems and dealing with facts that connect to the real world. Intuitive are innovative and can easily get bored with repetitions .Visual learners they learn best using diagrams ,films and pictures. Verbal learners uses sound and audio and get more out of sound .Sequential learners they understand things step by step and easily gets complicated well a step is missed or not unsounded well. Global learners lik e the big picture and collects large amounts of information without seeing the connections between them and they get it later.Peter Honey and Mumford learning stylesThey divided learning styles into four categories which are activist, reflector, theorist and pragmatist. Activists like new ideas and experience and they enjoy to act first .They learn best when they work in group work and given challenges and like the idea of leading discussions a good deal. They learn less in lectures, thinking on their own and writing. Reflectors like to use different perspectives and learn best by observing for example groups explanations. They learn less when they are leading a discussion .Theorists learn best when they are have clear understanding of a situation and when they are able to ask question to create ideas. Pragmatists they are curious about new things and learn best when give an example to copy .They learn less when there are no recognized benefits and when there are no guidelinesCarl Jung learning stylesThese styles are divided into four learning styles which are extraverts, sensors, thinkers and judgers. He extraverts like to try ideas and thinks on the outer world of the people. Sensors are practical they love details and facts they are also known as intuitors. Thinkers make their choices based on logic and facts. Judgers works with targets.From a research I discovered that I am an accommodator with a number of weaknesses and strengths which I need to adjust. The weaknesses examples are as follows does not check work, prioritize well ,neglects subjects that does not interest and not good. My areas of strength like getting involved, working well with people, ask a lot of questions, enthusiastic A diverger is creative and good in seeing the big picture get a line to other and share ideas but he or she forgets the important details while understanding the big picture, does not organise w By completing the graph I found that Iam an accommodator and on the posit ive side an accommodator is totally involved in something of interest for example if he has passion for maths he or she is mostly promising to spend much of his or her time working out Maths problems, likes to take risk of his or her ideas this means that an accommodator is to much experimental for example writing an exam without being fully prepared. Has a lot of curiosity that as he or she asks a lot of questions and this the accommodator an advantage because as many questions come also means more answers.An accommodator works quickly and he or she is active this benefits a lot in exam time management. Has the capabilities of using senses well that is seeing, smell and hearing .Which is an advantage if the person does not have any of the harm on senses .However of the other hand an accommodator has the following weaknesses like abject planning of work in advance this is a disadvantage as the accommodator is most likely not to get assignments properly done and does not pre-rea d before lectures, rarely checks work this leads to many errors in writing essays and assignments, does not understand the question but hurries to write for example respondent a question wrongly because of assuming what the question wants this results in difference of marks . An accommodator has a poor time management for example attending lectures late ,forgetting assignments .Does not prioritise well and easily get distracted with circumstances this diverts all attention to something of a lower antecedence for example concentrating more on reading books which does not relate to the real(a) subjects. This accounts for the accommodators failureBy recognizing and understanding your own learning styles, you can use techniques better suited to you. This improves the speed and quality of your learning. This can be assist by practicing helpful tips like taking study breaks and physical exercises,

No comments:

Post a Comment