Arguements For Gun Control Essay -- essays research papers

The emphasis in nows world, has become ordinary and common. This violencecauses a staggering look of deaths and injuries throughout the world. The mainweapon used to engage in violence is the poor boy. Thats why I want a strict hero controlpolicy that would nearly abolish ordnances and make the world a safer place. This policy wouldmake it impossible to buy guns and would only allow hunters to countenance guns. By doingthis, violence, related to guns, would greatly and rapidly decrease. On April 20th, 1999, 2 friends from Columbine, conscientious objector came to school. They had adiabolical proposal to try and kill as umteen people as possible. They were well prep ared andhad thought out their plan carefully. Together they had 4 guns with them when theybegan their operation. It resulted in the biggest gun issue in the U.S. to date. 12students and a teacher were killed, thats not including the 2 killers who perpetrate suicideshortly after the murders. Around 20 others w ere injured. This single title at Columbinehigh school sparked a question in American society, is our gun control policy strongenough? I enounce it isnt, with all the deaths and or related to violence in our body politic today,its nearly nearly impossible to ignore it. I say we need a very strict gun control policy. An after diasters like Columbine, a lot of people agree with me. Unfortunately, thegovernment meet cant snap their fingers and automatically generate a gun control policy. Likeall laws and regulations, it must go through relative and if it gets through that, then it hasto be signed by the president. Many gun control policies and been proposed in congressand most havent make up made it through a committee. According to the article Gun look into vs. Gun Rights, on www.opensecrets.org, the government only takes action ongun control when a diaster occurs or when a well known mannequin is killed. In my eyes, thisis entirely true considering that when a normal everyday joe is killed, he doesnt makenational headlines. It makes sense however, the people arent qualifying to make a big dealout of a goof that they dont know. Also its a known item that when it comes to guncontrol, democrats and republicans, split right down the middle when it comes to guncontrol. Democrats prefer heavy restriction on guns. Republicans sway towards gunrights and tend to compensate behind the second amendment. This results in gridlock (when... ...ssible considering that since the demand would go upand the lend would go way down, roughly people would be able to export them in fromother countries from lots of money. Also I understand that the hunters in particularwouldnt be happy with this policy. I myself am not a hunter, I dont believe in cleanup positionsomething for fun. I do, however, understand that Im from an urban society and wasntraised remotely close to how most people who hunt are raised. Some hunters argue thatits a source of food yet its not surviva l food and therefore I wouldnt let hunters keeptheir guns. I know that Im creation extremely bias, but I feel very strongly against guns andwhat they are capable of. Dont get me wrong, I know that guns have probably helped uswar most of war weve fought and saved some families from starvation but its todayworld theres just no need for them. I love to argue my point. I also love a challenge. Thats why Ive trenchant to debatesomeone standing by his own opinion, our founding fathers, and the 2nd amendment ofthe U.S. Constitution. The actricles that Im going to rip apart, is Gun Control IsntAbout Guns, Its About Control and 43 to 1, by Mark Howerter.