Consequences of Unethical Behavior Essay

I had not heard of this until now, actu eachy. Google salaried their vogue verboten of CEO prosecution last year. Not only was their behaviour unethical, and illegal, it was very socially irresponsible to the Ameri endure people. Google was taking part in advertizing narcotics and other prescription drugs for an illegal Canadian pharmacy on the American internet making all of these drugs readily available to the American people. David Whitaker, a federal inmate and convicted con-artist became posed as an American presidency agent who went undercover to prove Google knew exactly what was going on.Google advertisement executives authentic the $200,000 worth of the governments furbish up-up money to begin advertising. Whitaker collected emails and enter calls to prove that Google knew what they were doing were illegal. Even though it was obvious through the evidence to incur that Google representatives knew that the advertisements were illegal, they extended Whitaker a very gen erous credit line and allowed me to set my betoken advertising directly to American consumers.On August 24th, 2011, Google paid $500M dollars to pay their fines and avoid prosecution of their C. E. O. Larry paginate. Through the emails and recordings, it is made obvious that Page knew exactly what was going on. Google was allowing illegal Canadian pharmacies to platform their ads on Google and target the American population. Google allowing American consumers to be targeted is absolutely outrageous. Googles $500M fine covers the advertising costs and profits of the companies. The Department of Justice also has a non-prosecution parallelism with Google.Now, what exactly is a non-prosecution agreement? To me, this all sounds like something illegal all the way around. How can a company, any company, buy their way out of prosecution? How can a C. E. O. not be classified as a drug peddler who well knows of what is going on inwardly his company? How does this make him any different th at Bernie Madoff or the Goldman Sachs C. E. O.? Google was allowing drugs to be interchange through their network, period point blank with the citizens of America being the target.How can a company buy their way out of prosecution? I just do not understand. If I was caught selling drugs, or braggy people a platform to sell, I would be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Would I be able to buy my way out of prosecution? I absolutely would not The American government would lock me away and take their lovable time about taking me to trial and finishing my case. Why was this not made more public? Now, it seems, Google is being looked into from every aspect, in which they should.